“Expanding the Professional Liability of Architects and Engineers to Contractors,” ActionLine

More than 45 years ago, the Florida Supreme Court established in A.R. Moyer v. Graham that an architect can be liable to a contractor who is impacted by the architect’s negligence. A.R. Moyer established the potential for liability even without contractual privity between the architect and the contractor. Opinions that have directly applied A.R. Moyer to architects and engineers have closely examined the question of whether these professionals had final authority to terminate a contractor, shut down a project or withhold payment. Architects who merely made “recommendations” to owners did not have true supervisory authority and therefore often owned no duty to contractors. In the recent Singer opinion, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has arguably blurred the line between decisions and recommendations, thereby  potentially expanding liability for architects and engineers. The reasoning of Singer suggests that architects and engineers who make recommendations to receptive owners that are relying on the professional’s expertise may owe contractors a duty.